Skip to main content

Challenges in the Commercialization of Large Language Models

LizAbout 2 minLLMLLMRAGChallenge

Challenges in the Commercialization of Large Language Models

    1. Current Solutions for Rapid Commercial Deployment: RAG
    1. Challenges in the Commercialization of LLM
    1. Generation and Retrieval
    1. Use Case: Implementation of an Intelligent Customer Service System

1. Current Solutions for Rapid Commercial Deployment: RAG

  • RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
  • RAG is a practical approach for achieving rapid commercialization at the current stage
  • It enables quick integration of existing business data into the LLM domain

2. Challenges in the Commercialization of LLM

2.1. Performance

  • The requirements differ between B2B and B2C
    • B2B: Enterprises have high expectations for performance and accuracy
    • B2C: Generally lower expectations with a higher tolerance for errors, as users are more forgiving

2.2. Controllable Generation

  • LLMs generate content with a certain level of freedom, which means the output is not always as intended
  • Implementing controls or constraints can help guide model output to align with desired outcomes

2.3. Privacy

  • Models like GPT-4 can potentially extract user privacy information through guided prompts

2.4. Hallucination

  • Models sometimes generate plausible-sounding but inaccurate information ("hallucinations", /həˈluː.sɪ.neɪt/)
    • Makes statements that sound plausible but are not true
    • Generate fictitious information such as invalid URLs or non-existent numbers
  • How to reduce hallucinations
    • First find relevant information, then answer the question based on the relevant information.
  • Question: Can relying solely on the provided context completely resolve the hallucination problem in models?
    • It cannot completely resolve it, but it can significantly reduce hallucinations
    • Reasons it cannot be fully resolved:
      • Retrieval accuracy
      • LLM comprehension capabilities
      • Complexity of the question

3. Generation and Retrieval

3.1. Generation

  • Pros: Content diversity and creativity
  • Cons: Lack of control over the generated content

3.2. Retrieval

  • Pros: Provides controlled and reliable output
  • Cons: Limited by the boundaries of available content

3.3. Combining Generation and Retrieval: RAG

  • RAG, or Retrieval-Augmented Generation, combines retrieval to support and enhance generation
  • It brings together the strengths of both generation and retrieval

4. Use Case: Implementation of an Intelligent Customer Service System

4.1. Retrieval-Based Approach

    1. Build a set of frequently asked question pairs (FAQ, i.e., <Q, A>)
    1. Retrieve related questions based on the user’s query
    1. Provide the answer to the most relevant question as the result

Characteristics:

  • Requires the construction of a Q&A dataset
  • Provides accurate and reliable answers

4.2. Generation-Based Approach

    1. Build a set of Q&A pairs
    1. Train the model on this Q&A dataset
    1. The model generates an answer based on the user’s query

Characteristics:

  • Requires constructing a Q&A dataset
  • The generated responses are less reliable and harder to control

4.3. Combined Retrieval and Generation Approach

    1. Build a knowledge base (not necessarily in Q&A format)
    1. User inputs a question
    1. Retrieve relevant information from the knowledge base as candidates
    1. Input the user’s question, the candidate information, and previous conversation history into a prompt
    1. Feed the prompt into the large language model (LLM), which generates the final response

Characteristics:

  • No need to organize data into a Q&A format
  • The LLM's generated response is based on information retrieved from the knowledge base, leading to more reliable results